header-logo header-logo

18 July 2014 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7615 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Striking a fair balance

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide an update on disputed probate cases

In King v Dubrey and others [2014] EWHC 2083 (Ch) the deceased made a will in 1998 leaving £19,000 in legacies to friends and relatives, and her residuary estate to a number of animal charities. The main asset in her estate was a property in Hertfordshire, worth approximately £350,000 at the time of trial, into which her nephew, Mr King, moved to look after her in 2007.

On 19 November 2010, 4 February 2011 and 24 March 2011, the deceased prepared various documents to the effect that King should have the property when she died. None of the documents constituted a valid will in law. King stated that, in around late 2010/early 2011, the deceased presented him with the deeds to the property and said to him: “This will be yours when I go.” King claimed to have taken the deeds and put them into his wardrobe.

King claimed that the deceased, who died on 10 April 2011, had made a donatio mortis causa (DMC) of her house

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll