header-logo header-logo

Strictly compliant

Julian Miller and Parminder Badhan emphasise the importance of complying with notification provisions in insurance policies

Under a claims-made insurance policy, the insurer is liable for claims made against the insured by a third party during the policy period. A notification provision, which is a key feature of all claims-made policies, allows the insured to notify its insurer when it becomes aware of circumstances that might later give rise to a claim. Subsequent claims arising from the circumstances notified are then covered by the policy.

The scope and operation of notification provisions in claims-made policies has not always been entirely clear. Two High Court cases, HLB Kidsons (a firm) v Lloyd's Underwriters subscribing to Lloyd's Policy No 621/ PKID00101 [2007] EWHC 1951, [2008] 2 All ER 769, and more recently, Kajima UK Engineering Ltd v Underwriter Insurance Co Ltd [2008] EWHC 83, [2008] All ER (D) 194 (Jan), provide clarification.

The Facts

HLB Kidsons (a firm of accountants) had received claims arising from tax avoidance schemes. It argued that it had notified the underwriter of the circumstances giving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll