header-logo header-logo

30 October 2009 / Heather Platt
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Stress alert!

Heather Platt provides an update on stress related case law

Stress has been described by the Court of Appeal as “an excess of demands upon an individual in excess of their ability to cope” (see Hatton v Sutherland and other appeals [2002] EWCA Civ 76, [2002] All ER (D) 53 (Feb)).

Stress is not a psychiatric injury: however it can lead to feelings of anxiety and depression or exacerbate other conditions such as dyslexia or epilepsy. Employers should be aware that employees may become disabled for the purposes of Disability Discrimination Act 1995, s 1.

The Court of Appeal felt that there are no occupations which should be regarded as intrinsically dangerous to mental health. Further, an employer is entitled to assume that an employee is able to withstand the ordinary pressures of the job and is generally entitled to take what he is told by his employee at face value, unless there is a good reason to think to the contrary.

Case law

The starting point is LJ Hale’s now well known guidelines in Hatton (approved by the House of Lords in Barber

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll