header-logo header-logo

04 December 2015 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7679 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Strange but true

web_backpage_2

That’s entertainment: Dominic Regan goes behind the scenes of showbiz legal wranglings

The entertainment industry has generated a disproportionate number of bitter claims. The reason is simple: money. A successful song, film or entertainer can pull in millions and royalties accrue for decades beyond. Disputes go to court and can reveal astonishing tales.

Go for gross

One lesson for every adviser is not to agree a deal whereby your client is to receive a percentage of net profits. Those taking the money will seek to subtract every conceivable overhead so as to reduce the size of the fund upon which the percentage is calculated. Best advice is to go instead for a cut of the gross takings, a figure which is readily ascertainable!

Seeing red

Sometimes it is the entertainer who is found to be in the wrong. Chris “Top Gear” Evans was involved in a vicious High Court action which he instituted arising out of his antics while working as a DJ for Virgin Radio. In Evans v SMG Ltd [2003] EWHC 1423 (Ch), [2003] All ER (D) 348 (Jun), Lightman J found the claimant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll