header-logo header-logo

28 February 2008 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Company , Public , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A sting in the tail

Michael Salter and Chris Bryden consider the problems left behind by insolvent employers

It is estimated that every day in the 50 companies go out of business. Beyond the initial impact this will have on employees, who are likely to end up losing their jobs, there may also be a secondary sting in the tail when they find that money they are owed will not be as easy to obtain as they first thought.

Not only may this mean that wage payments due and owing are not made, it may also mean that there are difficulties in obtaining redundancy payments. Further, any claims currently pending in the employment tribunal or county court, or potential claims not yet issued, are likely to be affected by the employer’s insolvency. Various legal avenues exist to provide employees of insolvent employers with at least some recompense.

 

INSOLVENCY

The Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) provides that an employee’s claim for remuneration— which includes all wages and salary, whether for time or piece-work or earned wholly or partly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll