header-logo header-logo

28 February 2008 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Company , Public , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A sting in the tail

Michael Salter and Chris Bryden consider the problems left behind by insolvent employers

It is estimated that every day in the 50 companies go out of business. Beyond the initial impact this will have on employees, who are likely to end up losing their jobs, there may also be a secondary sting in the tail when they find that money they are owed will not be as easy to obtain as they first thought.

Not only may this mean that wage payments due and owing are not made, it may also mean that there are difficulties in obtaining redundancy payments. Further, any claims currently pending in the employment tribunal or county court, or potential claims not yet issued, are likely to be affected by the employer’s insolvency. Various legal avenues exist to provide employees of insolvent employers with at least some recompense.

 

INSOLVENCY

The Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) provides that an employee’s claim for remuneration— which includes all wages and salary, whether for time or piece-work or earned wholly or partly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll