header-logo header-logo

16 May 2014 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7606 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

A step too far

web_zander

Michael Zander QC does not support the Court of Appeal’s decision in Mitchell

The decision in Mitchell v News Group Newspapers [2013] EWCA Civ 1537, given by Lord Dyson MR for a unanimous Court of Appeal, has been described as the most important civil procedure decision of the past 40 years. As someone who has over the years taken some part in public debate about civil procedure, I have to say that I do not support the decision.

A tougher approach

A few days before the Jackson reforms went live on 1 April 2013, Lord Dyson gave the 18th in the series of Jackson Implementation Lectures. In his lecture Lord Dyson explained why it had become necessary to adopt a tougher approach to implementation of the CPR. The relationship between justice and procedure had changed. The justice system was now to be concerned with more than the instant case. “It is a system that has to command public confidence through securing for the majority, many of whom have limited resources, access to a system that itself must operate with limited resources. Doing justice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll