header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008 / Hina Majid
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A step too far

Special immigration status is highly objectionable, costly and unnecessary, says Hina Majid

A particularly obnoxious piece of legislation—Pt 12 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill—is easing its way through the corridors of . Part 12 creates a special immigration status (SIS), which classifies its recipients as people without leave to remain in the , and prevents them from obtaining temporary admission.

 

Its bite, however, penetrates far more deeply, incapacitating its recipients through the indefinite denial of those basic rights most of us take for granted. The right to earn a living and to sustain a family home, to access mainstream housing or welfare benefits, to access most secondary healthcare, and all forms of further and higher education are all likely to be withdrawn as a result of the operation of the scheme. So, too, is the ability to secure residential stability though acquisition of settlement or British nationality for the SIS’s duration.

 

FOREIGN NATIONAL CRIMINALS

SIS can be applied to “foreign national criminals”, who are liable to deportation, and cannot be removed from the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll