header-logo header-logo

A step too far

31 January 2008 / Hina Majid
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Special immigration status is highly objectionable, costly and unnecessary, says Hina Majid

A particularly obnoxious piece of legislation—Pt 12 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill—is easing its way through the corridors of . Part 12 creates a special immigration status (SIS), which classifies its recipients as people without leave to remain in the , and prevents them from obtaining temporary admission.

 

Its bite, however, penetrates far more deeply, incapacitating its recipients through the indefinite denial of those basic rights most of us take for granted. The right to earn a living and to sustain a family home, to access mainstream housing or welfare benefits, to access most secondary healthcare, and all forms of further and higher education are all likely to be withdrawn as a result of the operation of the scheme. So, too, is the ability to secure residential stability though acquisition of settlement or British nationality for the SIS’s duration.

 

FOREIGN NATIONAL CRIMINALS

SIS can be applied to “foreign national criminals”, who are liable to deportation, and cannot be removed from the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll