header-logo header-logo

25 January 2013 / Keith Patten
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Step back in time

Removing liability for health & safety regulation breaches would take us back to the 19th century, says Keith Patten

Imagine the following facts: Fireman Sam is on duty at a fire station. An emergency call is received that a woman is trapped under a heavy vehicle 300m from the fire station. The officer in charge directs Sam, and some of his colleagues, to attend the scene, along with a large and heavy jack standing on four wheels. The only vehicle available to transport the jack is an ordinary lorry with a plain floor and sides. There is nothing to which the jack can be secured, so Sam and his colleagues cling on to it to try to stop it from moving around in the back of the lorry. Shortly after leaving the fire station the driver is forced to apply the brakes sharply. Sam and his colleagues are unable to stop the jack from moving. As it does so, it strikes Sam’s ankle causing him a serious, career-threatening injury.

Current law

The modern claimant personal injury lawyer representing Sam would reach

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll