header-logo header-logo

20 January 2009 / Janna Purdie
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Statements of truth

Janna Purdie highlights the importance of ensuring witnesses understand the consequences of providing false information supported by a statement of truth
 

Statements of truth
Statements of truth must not be regarded as a mere formality. Yet in practice do practitioners clearly explain the consequences of giving false information supported by a statement of truth? Certainly in the case of KJM Motorbikes v Hinton, which came before the Court of Appeal last week, the answer would appear to be no.

In that case, the Court of Appeal emphasised the importance of making witnesses aware of the dangers they face in such circumstances. Th e witness’s contempt of court had been deemed serious by the first instance court but permission for contempt of court proceedings were unsuccessful as the judge’s view was that such proceedings would not benefi t the administration of justice. Th e Court of Appeal disagreed. In its judgment, which all practitioners should take note of, it is clear that courts should, in the future, take a more stringent line in deciding whether to grant permission to bring contempt of court proceedings where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll