header-logo header-logo

17 April 2015 / Frances Ratcliffe
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

State of play

nlj_april_17_ratclife

The latest developments in property cohabitation cases: where are we now, asks Frances Ratcliffe

In Stack v Dowden [2007] 2 AC 432, [2007] 2 All ER 929, the majority of the House of Lords disavowed the relevance of the presumption of resulting trust in cases concerning the beneficial interests in real property registered in the joint names of cohabitating couples for their joint occupation for domestic purposes. Rather, in the words of Baroness Hale, the search is to ascertain the parties’ shared intentions, actual, inferred or imputed with respect to the property in the light of their whole course of conduct in relation to it. Stack reiterated that the starting point in considering the apportionment of beneficial interests is that equity follows the law: so, in cases of sole legal ownership, the starting point is sole beneficial ownership, and in cases of joint legal ownership it is joint beneficial ownership. Moreover, cases of joint legal ownership where the beneficial interests are not shared equally will be “very unusual”. Stack was itself such a case, where the claimant unsuccessfully claimed an equal share of the beneficial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll