header-logo header-logo

State immunity laws breach human rights

05 February 2025
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Legal News , International , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail
Immunity laws designed to protect embassies are incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the Court of Appeal has confirmed.

Kingdom of Spain v Lorenzo [2025] EWCA Civ 59, handed down last week, follows the court’s ruling in December, at [2024] EWCA Civ 1602, in a claim brought by Lydia Lorenzo, a dual UK and Spanish national living in London when she was recruited to work in the Spanish Embassy. Lorenzo brought an employment tribunal claim for race discrimination and constructive unfair dismissal. The court accepted Spain’s immunity with regards to part of the case, but dismissed Spain’s attempt to assert immunity from Equality Act 2010 claims.

In last week’s ruling, as sought by the claimant, the court exercised its discretion to declare s 4(2)(a) of the State Immunity Act 1978 incompatible with art 6 of the ECHR, the right to a fair trial.

Section 4(2)(a) provides an exception. A state has no immunity in proceedings concerning employment contracts made in the UK or where the work is to be wholly or partly performed there unless ‘at the time when the proceedings are brought the individual is a national of the State concerned’. This would have given Spain immunity from Lorenzo’s employment claim as she has dual nationality.

Jehad Mustafa, partner at Farrer & Co, said: ‘This will likely result in Parliament changing UK law, allowing nationals of sending states to sue their own diplomatic missions in the UK’s employment tribunals.

‘This ruling will have widespread implications for the diplomatic community in London with potential for the work of diplomatic missions to be significantly disrupted. The ruling is set against the backdrop of London’s diplomatic community already processing a wave of unfavourable recent UK judgments, resulting in the UK being seen as an outlier globally.

‘This latest ruling brings into question whether the State Immunity Act 1978 is fit-for-purpose in its current form, as the world and the challenges facing diplomats are vastly different almost 50 years on. If reforms to immunities standards are sought, the UK should engage with the international community, to ensure a co-ordinated and consistent approach.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll