header-logo header-logo

15 September 2017
Issue: 7761 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Stamp Duty Land Tax

Frosh and others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2017] UKUT 320 (TCC), [2017] All ER (D) 56 (Aug)

The taxpayers’ application to the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (the FTT) seeking a direction for the issue of closure notices in respect of enquiries by the Revenue and Customs Commissioners into stamp duty land tax returns made by the taxpayers was dismissed by the FTT. On appeal, the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) dismissed the taxpayers’ appeal on the ground, among other things, that, in the circumstances, the FTT had been entitled to decide that the absence of the information and documents relating to the taxpayers’ own transactions had provided reasonable grounds for the Revenue not to give a closure notice.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll