header-logo header-logo

23 July 2010
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Stamp Duty and Stamp Duty Reserve Tax

Stamp Duty and Stamp Duty Reserve Tax (Investment Exchanges and Clearing Houses) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/1818)

Ensure the stamp charges are only paid once by the ultimate purchaser thereby improving liquidity in the securities markets.

Remove multiple charges to stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax from transactions made on a multilateral trading facility operated by Turquoise Services Limited and are transferred through certain recognised clearing houses, their members and their nominees.

Revoke and replace the Stamp Duty and Stamp Duty Reserve Tax (Investment Exchanges and Clearing Houses) Regulations (No 8) 2009 (SI 2009/1827) so as to include European Multilateral Clearing Facility NV as a prescribed clearing house able to trade under these provisions.

 

In force : 10 August 2010

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll