header-logo header-logo

24 September 2020 / Chris Williams
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Staking a claim: contesting a will

28047
Chris Williams discusses a court’s approach to a 1975 Act claim

In brief

  • Re H (deceased) SH v NH and another [2020] EWHC 1134 (Fam): a 1975 Act claim against an estate for reasonable financial provision.

In Re H (deceased) SH v NH and another [2020] EWHC 1134 (Fam), [2020] All ER (D) 86 (May) the claimant (C) made a 1975 Act claim against the estate of her late father (F) (who died in 2016) for reasonable financial provision. F’s estate was calculated at £554,000, being F’s half share of the property owned jointly with his wife (£350,000), a half share in joint accounts with his wife (£63,000) and the executor’s account (£141,000).

The defendants were C’s mother (D1) and C’s brother (D2), as executor of his late father’s estate.

  • C and D2 were the only children of the marriage and D1 was the sole beneficiary of F’s estate.
  • D1 was aged 80, had extensive health problems, was profoundly deaf, lived in a care home and was worried about how her future care was going
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll