header-logo header-logo

30 July 2015 / Nicholas Griffin KC
Issue: 7664 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Spy cops under scrutiny

nlj_7664_griffin

Nicholas Griffin QC explores the scope & approach of the Pitchford Inquiry into undercover policing

Recently, there have been numerous and significant revelations about the way in which the state exercises its powers to spy on its own citizens. For its part, the government explains that we live in a time of terrorist threat and the law enforcement and spy agencies must be given the tools and powers they need to meet that threat. The result is that most of us are left wondering where the line between the competing interests of our security on the one hand and our privacy on the other should be drawn. 

Much of the media coverage has focused on the activities of the spy agencies in this country and in the US, particularly after the revelations of Edward Snowden. However, many of the same issues arise in connection with the activities of the police, including with the use of undercover officers who can gain access to our most private thoughts and information. It is now suggested (and in some cases accepted) that along the way undercover

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll