header-logo header-logo

In the spotlight

L-J Patterson continues her series on unique women who have forged significant pathways through our legal landscape and turns the spotlight on Madeleine Heggs

Sixty per cent of law students and 63% of medical school students were listed as female in a 2004 higher education survey (The Observer, 6 June 2004)—a far cry from the 1940s and 1950s, when university places offered to women for these subjects were extremely rare. Further, it was a general expectation that women would give up their profession on marriage. This, against the backdrop of post-war life and economy, was the time in which Madeleine Heggs began her long and successful law career, one that would lead to her appointment as social security and child support commissioner: the first woman—and only woman for 20 years—to be so.

When Heggs was appointed as a commissioner, the other 13 commissioners in England and Wales were silks or Chancery silks, benchers or senior juniors. Not only was Heggs the first woman to be chosen, she was the first practising solicitor.

Her law career began in 1949 when

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll