header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
25 March 2016 / Ben Savery , James Deacon
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail

A spot test on strategy

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
001_nlj_7692_savery

James Deacon & Ben Savery set out the lessons to be learnt from recent Pt 36 case law

A raft of recent cases has underlined the importance of making Pt 36 offers that are strategic, timely and correctly formulated.

Question 1

Can you make an offer to settle for a percentage of liability that could never be awarded in practice and is there a minimum reduction you should make?

Answer: The High Court has clarified that you can make such an offer and a modest reduction may suffice.

In Jockey Club Racecourses Ltd v Willmott Dixon Construction Ltd [2016] EWHC 167 (TCC), [2016] All ER (D) 90 (Feb), the defendant agreed to design and build a grandstand at Epsom. The roof failed and was later found to be defective. The club issued proceedings for the costs of repair and business interruption. It later made a Pt 36 offer to settle liability at 95% of the damages “to be assessed”. Willmott Dixon did not respond. It was directed that there would be a split trial but the defendant later conceded liability before trial.

It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll