header-logo header-logo

03 March 2011 / Cathrine Grubb
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Sporting chance

Cathrine Grubb reports on when fun & games become a breach of duty

In the area of sports and recreation it has already been established that participants owe a duty of care to other participants and spectators. The legal duty owed to fellow participants is to exercise “all care that is objectively reasonable in the prevailing circumstances for the avoidance of infliction of injury on other contestants”: Caldwell v Maguire [2001] EWCA Civ 1054, [2001] All ER (D) 363 (Jun). The prevailing circumstances include the object of the contest, the demands made on its contestants, its inherent dangers, its rules, conventions and customs, and the standards of skill and judgment reasonably to be expected of the contestant. As was noted in the case of Caldwell, given the fast-paced nature of most competitive sports, a momentary lapse of skill or error of judgment made when subject to the stresses of competition is not enough to give rise to a breach of duty. In practice, the claimant is likely to have to show that the conduct of which s/he complains amounts to a “reckless disregard for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll