header-logo header-logo

03 March 2011 / Cathrine Grubb
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Sporting chance

Cathrine Grubb reports on when fun & games become a breach of duty

In the area of sports and recreation it has already been established that participants owe a duty of care to other participants and spectators. The legal duty owed to fellow participants is to exercise “all care that is objectively reasonable in the prevailing circumstances for the avoidance of infliction of injury on other contestants”: Caldwell v Maguire [2001] EWCA Civ 1054, [2001] All ER (D) 363 (Jun). The prevailing circumstances include the object of the contest, the demands made on its contestants, its inherent dangers, its rules, conventions and customs, and the standards of skill and judgment reasonably to be expected of the contestant. As was noted in the case of Caldwell, given the fast-paced nature of most competitive sports, a momentary lapse of skill or error of judgment made when subject to the stresses of competition is not enough to give rise to a breach of duty. In practice, the claimant is likely to have to show that the conduct of which s/he complains amounts to a “reckless disregard for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll