header-logo header-logo

22 July 2020 / Shane Crawford
Issue: 7896 / Categories: Features , Employment , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Sponsorship, risk assessment & a duty to comply

24644
Shane Crawford highlights the complex situation of sponsoring an immigrant worker during the pandemic
  • Tensions between latest government advice for sponsors of immigrant workers: what are the implications for sponsors regarding right to work and possible termination of employment?

Current focus for commentary in employment law has been on the effect of certain principles on the employment relationship for domestic workers.

Included in the recent guidelines issued by the government were provisions for employers of immigrant workers for whom the employer has assigned a Certificate of Sponsorship (CoS)—Government COVID-19 advice (https://bit.ly/3cNsy9t).

This in summary states that during the present lockdown a sponsor may employ a worker if:

  • certificate of sponsorship is assigned;
  • the worker submitted an immigration application before expiry of previous leave (so not an overstayer); and
  • the role for which a worker is employed is the same as in the certificate of sponsorship.

But the advice goes on to state that the employer must dismiss if the immigration application is refused. This does not sit easily with employment law governing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll