header-logo header-logo

23 March 2012 / David Burrows
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

Splitting up

hires_2_4

David Burrows notes the complexities that surround the severance of joint tenancy

Two recent cases have illustrated the complexities of English property law where land is held jointly by co-owners (whether married or unmarried). Legal title is always held jointly; and the survivor will own the whole title. The beneficial interests can be severed so that the owners will generally have a half share each in the beneficial ownership of the property and in the proceeds of sale. On the death of one, the survivor holds the legal title alone. The severed beneficial interest vests in the dead owner’s estate: the survivor holds it in trust for the estate.

Title will normally be severed by written notice of severance (Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925), s 36(2)); but Elements of Land Law by Gray and Gray, fifth edition (2009) (Gray) identifies six other methods of severance (in an area of law described by Gray as of “unnecessary complexity”: para 7.4.68). Those of immediate concern to the family lawyer will be: severance by “an act operating on the joint tenancy” (eg bankruptcy);

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll