header-logo header-logo

09 April 2025
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Splits on the rise with only one lawyer

More separating couples are turning to a one-lawyer approach, according to family practitioners.

The family team at HCR Law says it has experienced an 88% rise in the number of divorcing or separating clients choosing its one-lawyer service in 2024 compared to 2023.

HCR partner Laura Williams said: ‘The traditional route of each spouse instructing their own lawyer can automatically entice hostility.

‘The one-lawyer approach ensures both parties receive clear advice, guidance and support while avoiding the drawn-out battles that often arise when each spouse uses their own solicitor and there is back and forth correspondence dealing with matters which could otherwise be dealt with swiftly.’

While not suitable for all couples, the increase in take-up indicates a growing preference for a less adversarial approach and aligns with the introduction of no-fault divorce in 2022.

Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll