header-logo header-logo

09 September 2022 / Dr Mike Wilkinson
Issue: 7993 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Split (legal) personalities?

93296
Corporate agents beware: Dr Mike Wilkinson dissects the mistaken belief that individuals running a company are shielded from personal liability for company wrongdoing
  • Those running a company often claim—wrongly—that they cannot be sued personally for their role in any wrongdoing and that any third party dealing with the company can only sue the company itself for the harm they have suffered.
  • While those running a company cannot be sued on a company’s contract, nor expected to give up property belonging to the company (unless the corporate veil is lifted), after the Supreme Court decision in Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd there is now no reason in principle why such persons cannot be sued for any wrongdoing they have committed or commissioned as a joint tortfeasor.

Persons dealing with a company often suffer losses at the hands of those running a company. They may wish to sue such persons individually, rather than suing the company itself—especially when the company is insolvent. All too often when such situations arise, misunderstandings abound, and third parties are deterred from bringing personal claims in the mistaken belief

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll