header-logo header-logo

27 January 2011
Issue: 7450 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Special procedure child dispute

A petition pleads a child as a non-child of the family but in his acknowledgement of service...

A petition pleads a child as a non-child of the family but in his acknowledgement of service the respondent contends that the child is a child of the family. No answer is filed. Can the case proceed in the special procedure list on the basis that the child is not a child of the family? 

No. The issue has wide implications and would need to be determined before certification of entitlement to a decree under the special procedure. Almost certainly, the district judge would list a directions hearing on the issue which the parties would be required to attend. Confusion by the parties or one of them often arises because of ignorance of the fact that a child is of the family if treated as such although one of the parties is not a biological parent. Problems also commonly arise where there is an inconsistency between the petition (drafted by solicitors) and the statement of arrangements (completed by the petitioner without being properly checked by the solicitors) as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll