header-logo header-logo

Solicitors shun courts and plot legal challenge

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

Criminal solicitors could bring a legal challenge against the Legal Services Commission’s (LSC’s) consultation paper on high cost cases.
Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association (CLSA) chair Ian Kelcey says he does not think the consultation, Very High Cost Case Panel, published last week, is adequate.

“It is not a consultation paper, but the LSC expects the profession to respond on it. This is something we might judicially review, and that line of action will be actively considered,” he says. “Practitioners are feeling used and abused by the government, who hasn’t listened to them, and who consistently ignore what the profession is saying.

“The proposals are now more draconian than Lord Carter’s—he proposed a fund to assist firms in making the changes but the government has withdrawn that from the plans.”

Striking criminal solicitors staged two days of disruptive action across the country last week in protest at reforms to the legal aid system. In south Cumbria, dozens of cases were reportedly adjourned as solicitors stayed away from the courts. The solicitors were protesting against low legal aid fees, as well as the Carter reforms, which will introduce price competitive tendering and drive many firms out of business or force them to merge.
The protest was not organised by the CLSA, although it gave its approval.
A spokesperson for the Department for Constitutional Affairs condemned the strike action. “We are disappointed that a small number of solicitors opted to carry out forms of disruptive action at the end of last week.

“Lord Falconer has previously urged solicitors not to take disruptive action and we strongly believe that by doing so, solicitors are not acting in their clients’ best interests.

“As with previous action this disruption has been limited and not nationwide, in most areas it has been business as usual and we hope the vast majority of lawyers will continue to provide a full service for their clients. Disrupting the criminal justice system and harming the interests of victims, defendants and the court system is unnecessary and irresponsible.”

Andrew Keogh, partner, Tuckers Solicitors, retorts: “Striking per se does not raise any ethical issues. We saw quite widespread action last week but existing client work was still protected, for example, solicitors set up agents’ arrangements at every magistrates’ court in London so there was at least one solicitor there.

“Therefore, the rights of vulnerable people were once again protected by the profession. The courts operated slowly but cases weren’t adjourned so the impact on the public was minimal.”

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll