header-logo header-logo

16 June 2021
Issue: 7937 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Solicitors Indemnity Fund given reprieve (for now)

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has announced the extension of the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) for a further year.

The delay means SIF will continue to provide post six-year run-off cover until September 2022 for claims against firms which have closed without a successor practice.

The extension is good news for retired solicitors, some of whom warned the closure of SIF would leave them exposed to the risk of historical claims.

The SRA will now consult on the future of post six-year run-off cover. It warned this week the extension is subject to an affordability test because the fund is deemed beyond the time when a conventional insurance company would have taken steps to bring it to a close.

Anna Bradley, chair of the SRA Board, said: ‘We will need to give careful consideration to finding the right regulatory balance between consumer protection and issues of proportionality, affordability and the wider public interest.’

However, Bradley said she recognised the concerns of the legal profession and the fact the insurance market has hardened, making it more difficult for alternative arrangements to be found.

Post six-year run-off cover is additional to the mandatory six-year run-off cover which the SRA requires firms to have. SIF closed in 2000 when the profession moved to an open market insurance model. It was originally due to close in September 2017, but there have been several extensions since then.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘We have been raising our concerns with the SRA, the regulator for this issue, for more than three years. 

‘We are pleased they are now taking steps to find an effective solution and undertake the detailed analysis required to assess the future of post six-year cover.

‘But it is not enough simply to delay closure again in the hope that next year the commercial indemnity insurance market will change and fill the gap in consumer protection that SIF closure will create. It needs to show imagination in looking at long-term solutions that provide proper levels of consumer protection and do not expose solicitors to ruinous claims or consumers to potentially lengthy and complex litigation.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll