header-logo header-logo

25 February 2016
Issue: 7688 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors feeling the squeeze at both ends of the profession

Partners are delaying retirement because of recent cuts in pension saving for high earners, creating a bottleneck at the senior end of the profession, according to research by accountants Smith & Williamson.

Its 21st Annual Survey of the Professional Services Sector shows that more than half of the partners questioned expect a rise in the retirement age to affect opportunities for partner development and hence succession planning. The accountants also report that 90% of the 95 firms surveyed leave individual partners to organise their own retirement planning.

Mike Fosberry, director at Smith & Williamson, said: “It is in firms’ own interests to support partners in making personal financial arrangements.”

At the other end of the spectrum, the Law Society has expressed concern that a new qualifying exam, Solicitors Qualifying Examination, could result in lower standards and reduce access to the profession.

Jonathan Smithers, Law Society President, said access would only be increased if training providers developed cheaper and more flexible courses: “Our concern is that the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) consultation contains little detail on the proposed assessments.” He accused the SRA of “making piecemeal announcements to the profession on its proposals. This is unhelpful and causing grave concern.”

However, Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: “All parties agree there is a problem caused by an inability to measure standards across providers. What we are proposing is a single assessment that we think will ensure, for the first time, consistent high standards of entry into the profession, regardless of pathway into the profession. This is a high-level consultation and we want to hear from as many interested parties as possible on the key issues.”

Issue: 7688 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll