header-logo header-logo

30 January 2026 / Victoria Morrison-Hughes
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Regulatory , Legal services , Fees , Costs
printer mail-detail

Solicitors Act: Time for reform

241432
The Solicitors Act 1974 belongs to a world of dusty volumes in oak-panelled libraries, writes Victoria Morrison-Hughes

The Solicitors Act 1974 has been the cornerstone of legal regulation in England and Wales for more than half a century, governing the admission of solicitors to the roll, practising certificates, professional discipline, and costs.

Drafted in a pre-digital era, when Ceefax, fax machines and photocopiers were cutting edge, it belongs to a world where lawyers researched from dusty volumes in oak-panelled libraries. Clients rarely challenged their solicitors’ bills because they trusted the profession.

Fast forward to 2025. Artificial intelligence (AI) churns out documents in seconds; lawyers spend their days squinting at blue-light screens, trying to separate genuine insight from hallucinations. The legal landscape has transformed, but the Solicitors Act 1974, despite amendments, has not. It is out of step with modern consumer law, leaving both clients and solicitors struggling to navigate its complexity.

Consumer confusion & regulatory fog

Many clients remain confused about who regulates who, what protections exist for them, and how to challenge fees or service.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll