header-logo header-logo

22 October 2025
Issue: 8136 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Legal services , Consumer , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

Solicitors’ regulator sanctioned for failures

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) must overhaul its complaints and risk assessment processes to fix ‘systemic shortcomings’, the Legal Services Consumer Panel has said

The panel called for ‘clear safeguards’ for clients involved in ‘high-risk legal arrangements, including litigation funding’ this week, in its response to Legal Services Board (LSB) moves to sanction the SRA for failing to protect thousands of clients affected by the collapse of law firm SSB Group.

An LSB-commissioned independent review by Northern Ireland firm Carson McDowell, published last week, found the SRA did not act effectively or efficiently in the five years leading to the collapse of the Sheffield firm despite receiving more than 100 reports.

It found the SRA did not take all the steps it could have taken, which meant it failed adequately to protect consumers, the public interest and professional standards.

The LSB will impose two sanctions on the SRA—a public censure and performance targets and monitoring.

SSB Group, which acted for thousands of clients in high-volume civil litigation claims, mainly relating to cavity wall insulation, went into administration in January 2024 owing £200m to litigation funders and other creditors. Many of its clients were subsequently pursued for adverse legal costs, despite having been assured their claims were ‘no win no fee’.

Catherine Brown, interim chair of the LSB, said: ‘The former clients of SSB have suffered profound emotional and financial harm.’

Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘The report lays bare a lack of leadership and oversight of regulatory procedures and processes at the SRA.

‘This is despite knowing the risks posed by bulk cavity wall insulation cases, the previous failure of Pure Legal from which the SRA transferred clients to SSB, and multiple reports from MPs, other lawyers, industry and the victims themselves. A key concern must be the treatment of vulnerable victims by the SRA.

‘This cannot just be about improving systems and processes but requires culture change and focused leadership.’

Anna Bradley, chair of the SRA, said: ‘We are sorry that we did not act more quickly in relation to SSB… We fully accept the recommendations of this review.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll