header-logo header-logo

03 February 2011
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Solicitor—Costs—Conditional fee agreement

Morris and another v Southwark London Borough Council (Law Society intervening) [2011] All ER (D) 183 (Jan), [2011] EWCA Civ 25

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Lloyd and Gross LJJ, 25 Jan 2011

A conditional fee agreement (CFA) providing for the claimant’s solicitors to indemnify her against payment of the defendant’s costs if the claim was dismissed is not champertous or otherwise contrary to public policy. It will therefore not invalidate a CFA which otherwise complies with s 58 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990.

Mark James (instructed by Belshaw & Curtin) for the claimants. Roger Mallalieu (instructed by Director of Communities Law and Governance, London Borough of Southwark) for the authority.  David Holland (instructed by the Law Society) for the interveners.

Two appeals before the court arose out of claims by residential tenants against the local authority landlord concerning alleged breaches of the landlord’s covenant. The claimants entered into a contract of engagement, which was a CFA with a 10% success fee. It also included the statement that: “If you lose, you pay your opponent’s charges and disbursements. You

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll