header-logo header-logo

17 March 2017
Issue: 7738 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Solicitor

Newell-Austin v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2017] EWHC 411 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 43 (Mar)

The Administrative Court dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the decision of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, striking her off the roll of solicitors and ordering her to pay the costs of the respondent Solicitors Regulation Authority. The tribunal had not been wrong in its factual findings as to the appellant’s lack of integrity and had plainly taken account of the appellant’s state of knowledge, nor had it erred in having found that she had deliberately and consciously misled the respondent.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll