header-logo header-logo

07 December 2016
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Snooper’s charter “falls short”

Lawyers have expressed concerns about the impact on lawyer-client confidentiality as a result of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016—the so-called “snooper’s charter”.

The Act, which covers state surveillance, received Royal Assent last month. Both the Law Society and the Bar Council campaigned for legal professional privilege to be given statutory protection in the Act through express recognition of its importance and provisions making it unlawful to deliberately target legally privileged communications.

This was not achieved. However, late amendments to the Bill in the House of Lords introduced “additional safeguards” strengthening requirements to destroy legally privileged material caught by surveillance. Such materials must now be destroyed unless it is in the public interest that they be kept. A code of practice will also be drawn up.

Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, chairman of the Bar, said: “Despite claims that the Investigatory Powers Act offers new protections for legally privileged material, sadly the Act falls significantly short of what we would consider sufficient to protect this important and fundamental right which underpins the rule of law. 

“We expect that draft codes of practice will be published in due course to give operational guidance to authorities. The Bar Council will scrutinise closely these draft codes, which ultimately must be approved by Parliament.”

Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll