header-logo header-logo

29 November 2021
Issue: 7959 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Smart contracts are legal & viable, Law Commission confirms

The Law Commission has confirmed that smart legal contracts can be accommodated by existing law, and there is no need for statutory law reform
While some incremental development of the common law may be required in some contexts, the current legal framework is sufficiently robust, the Commission concluded last week. To avoid any potential difficulties, however, it encouraged parties to include express terms such as clauses allocating risk in relation to the performance of the code, and setting out clearly the relationship between any natural language and coded components.

The Law Commission also published a short update paper on its work on cryptoassets and other digital assets. It explains that the Commission’s work will address different sub-categories of digital assets, and will consider whether certain digital assets might be most accurately categorised within a third category of property, distinct from the existing categories of tangible property (things in possession) and intangible property (things in action).

Professor Sarah Green, the Law Commissioner for the Commercial and Common Law Team, said: ‘Smart legal contracts could revolutionise the way we do business, particularly by increasing efficiency and transparency in transactions.

‘We have concluded that the current legal framework is clearly able to facilitate and support the use of smart legal contracts; an important step in ensuring increased recognition and facilitation of these agreements. Our related work on digital assets and conflict of laws will further establish England and Wales as a global leader for technological innovations in the digital sphere.’

A Law Society spokesperson said: ‘It’s a thoughtful analysis of the legal issues relating to digital commerce and makes a key contribution to ensuring the UK remains the best destination for digital business in future.’

 

Issue: 7959 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll