© Getty images
Janet Carter proposes a cost-neutral amendment on restraining orders which could make a significant difference to victims of domestic abuse
- Courts should be required to consider restraining orders in every domestic abuse case—and give reasons where none is made.
- Amending the Victims’ Code would ensure victims are informed and consulted, and end the current ‘postcode lottery’.
A simple amendment to sentencing law could significantly help the government achieve its target of reducing violence against women and girls by a half. It is cost-neutral and easy to implement because the resources are already in place.
As background, these are the choices available as principal sentences for offences involving domestic abuse:
- imprisonment for a short period of respite for the victim;
- a community order for a limited period to try and change behaviour;
- a fine; or exceptionally
- a discharge.
On top of this main sentence, the court has a range of potential ancillary orders. For example, the court is obliged to consider compensation if there is any personal injury, loss or damage (s 133, Sentencing
