header-logo header-logo

23 April 2015
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Slim election pickings for legal aid

Odds stacked against post-election renaissance for legal aid

The post-election outlook remains bleak for legal aid lawyers, whoever takes charge after next month’s general election.

Writing in NLJ this week, Steve Hynes, director of the Legal Action Group, notes that around £600m-£700m has been cut by the coalition government from the legal aid budget over this parliament. “The Conservatives seem committed to more cuts and former legal aid lawyer Sadiq Khan, the Labour Shadow Lord Chancellor, has made it clear that if they form the next government he will not be able to turn back the clock on all the changes to legal aid. Against this background the outlook does not appear optimistic for legal aid lawyers,” he says. Hynes notes that Justice Secretary Chris Grayling has decided to restart the tender process for criminal legal aid solicitors, while Labour has pledged to scrap the tenders if they make a return to government next month.

“This means legal aid firms still have to scurry to draft their tender applications by 5 May deadline, if they want to hedge their bets on the outcome of the election,” says Hynes.

Labour has agreed to look again at the 8.5% fee cut in criminal legal aid the current government plans for July. They will also reverse the changes to judicial review approved by Parliament last month, and have promised that “victims of domestic violence get the legal support they need to break free of violent relationships”. Meanwhile, the Lib Dems are committed to carrying out a review of civil legal aid, which could be included in a future coalition agreement.

David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and senior partner at Edwin Coe, says none of the parties likely to form the next government is likely to reverse the rise in court fees, but says there is a “glimmer of hope” that a new government might look again at the concept of hybrid damages-based agreements (DBAs).

Issue: 7649 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll