header-logo header-logo

07 December 2012 / David Greene
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Opinion , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Sleeping satellite?

Could satellite litigation be avoided following the Jackson reforms, asks David Greene

It appears that the Ministry of Justice and the judiciary are bent on introducing the Jackson reforms next April. Perhaps the only doubt is as to the precise date in April.

Revisiting Jackson

The Court of Appeal revisited one of the elements of the Jackson reforms recently. In Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1288, [2012] All ER (D) 90 (Oct), the Court of Appeal reviewed its decision made in July in which it announced that, with effect from 1 April 2013, general damages in tort cases would be increased by 10% from current levels.

The way in which the Court of Appeal addressed this reform was itself novel, in that the reform was tagged onto a personal injury claim which had gone to the Court of Appeal on one element of the judgment at first instance. The increase in general damages had absolutely nothing to do with the point before the court, but the court used the occasion to make the announcement about the increase of 10%.

The decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll