header-logo header-logo

08 March 2012 / Mark Warwick
Issue: 7504 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Signing your life away?

Mark Warwick studies the requirements of a legitimate will

On 31 January 2012 and 2 February 2012, the Court of Appeal handed down judgments dealing with the formalities required for the making of a will. In each case the court was faced with a conflict between upholding the testator’s intention and enforcing the requirements of s 9 of the Wills Act 1837 (WA 1837). Although the two judgments were plainly prepared by differently constituted Courts of Appeal in ignorance of one another, the judgments adopt a similar approach to the construction of s 9. This approach is one that demands an insistence upon exact compliance with the statutory requirements for the making of a will contained within s 9.

Literalism v intention

Since, in other fields, such as the construction of contracts, literalism often gives way to the party’s intentions, it is important to recognise that the formalities required to make a valid will are strictly enforced. It is for this reason, if no other, that the recent cases justify examination. From a practical point of view they could lend assistance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll