header-logo header-logo

08 March 2012 / Mark Warwick
Issue: 7504 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Signing your life away?

Mark Warwick studies the requirements of a legitimate will

On 31 January 2012 and 2 February 2012, the Court of Appeal handed down judgments dealing with the formalities required for the making of a will. In each case the court was faced with a conflict between upholding the testator’s intention and enforcing the requirements of s 9 of the Wills Act 1837 (WA 1837). Although the two judgments were plainly prepared by differently constituted Courts of Appeal in ignorance of one another, the judgments adopt a similar approach to the construction of s 9. This approach is one that demands an insistence upon exact compliance with the statutory requirements for the making of a will contained within s 9.

Literalism v intention

Since, in other fields, such as the construction of contracts, literalism often gives way to the party’s intentions, it is important to recognise that the formalities required to make a valid will are strictly enforced. It is for this reason, if no other, that the recent cases justify examination. From a practical point of view they could lend assistance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll