header-logo header-logo

21 June 2012 / David Burrows
Issue: 7519 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Signed & sealed?

David Burrows breaks the seal on Kim v Morris

 

Most divorce cases proceed as a simple administrative exercise, performed by court staff and a district judge, in exchange for a court fee of £340 (the same applies to “applicants” for civil partnership orders, to whom this article also applies). The process is entirely statutory; and thus any judicial discretion must be prescribed by statute. A case has to be properly pleaded: under Family Procedure
Rules 2010 (FPR 2010) forms mostly do that job.

Divorce procedure (FPR 2010, Pt 7) is based on extinct county court rules: interrogatories and discovery only went in April 2011. If a cause is defended, precision pleading is still essential. Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973), s 1(3) requires the court to “inquire” into the facts. If the facts (set out in s 1(2)) are proved, the marriage will be found to have irretrievably broken down (s 1(1)) and a decree will follow (s 1(5)). Though MCA 1973 does not say so, the decree is in the first instance a decree nisi which can be made absolute
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll