header-logo header-logo

07 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Side by side

A civil claim runs alongside an application for financial remedies and the two cases are to be heard together...

A civil claim runs alongside an application for financial remedies and the two cases are to be heard together. Should the civil claim still be allocated to track? Presumably, statements of case should be filed and served in the civil claim in the same way as if there were no connected proceedings?

The two cases should certainly be tried together and not consolidated. In the civil claim, statements of case should be filed and served in the usual way and allocation will be necessary where a defence is filed (CPR 26.5), unless the civil claim has been issued and is being allowed to continue under CPR Pt 8 in which event it will be deemed allocated to the multi track. Claims under the Trust of Land etc Act 1996 and Sch 1 to the Children Act 1989 are often heard together in this way and where a claim is closely linked to factual issues in the financial remedies application, the multi-track is usually regarded as the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll