header-logo header-logo

11 May 2012 / Richard Chapman
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Shutting up shop

Richard Chapman raises the alarm over county court counter closures

The counters of the county courts around England and Wales remain open all hours that the courts are open. The 2 April 2012 deadline, from when it was threatened that the counters would be closed, save for two hours a day, has come and gone. The extended consultation period has also come and gone. During that period, more than 300 responses were submitted, among which was the detailed response prepared by the Association of HM District Judges.

We viewed the proposed counter closure programme with alarm for a variety of reasons.

Workable safeguards

There must be a recognition that in order to make the county court system more efficient and to save costs that have to be saved, everyone involved will have to adapt to new procedures—HMCTS, county court users including litigants and legal representatives, and the judiciary. However, workable safeguards must be established for those court users who will struggle with what we are left with.

When I was articled back in the 1960s, I used to go to the counter

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll