header-logo header-logo

09 December 2016 / Jonah Anderson , Jonathan Pickworth
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Features , Charities , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Show me the money

nlj_7726_pickworth2jpg

Jonathan Pickworth & Jonah Anderson examine the proposed unexplained wealth order regime

 
  • Anti-money laundering law and regulation in the UK increasingly focuses on overseas politically exposed persons (PEPs).
  • The new Criminal Finances Bill proposes to introduce the “unexplained wealth order” (UWO), a civil investigative order.
  • A UWO will enable UK law enforcement to question PEPs regarding their wealth and allow civil recovery proceedings against their assets, even when there is no proof that the wealth in question is the proceeds of criminal activity.

The existing anti-money laundering (AML) law contains a civil recovery regime under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 which creates a non-conviction based asset recovery regime. This regime allows law enforcement to recover property which is, or which represents, property obtained through unlawful conduct. However, under the law as it currently stands, a claim for civil recovery cannot be sustained solely on the basis that a defendant had no identifiable lawful income to warrant their lifestyle and purchases, as set out in Director of the Assets Recovery Agency v Green [2005] EWHC 3168 (Admin), [2005] All ER

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll