Patricia Londono discusses the recent Supreme Court ruling in Khuja v Times Newspapers Ltd
- Khuja concerned an anonymity request by a man who was arrested along with other child rape and child trafficking suspects, but later de-arrested and subsequently not charged.
- Caselaw and discussion regarding the public’s views on high-profile suspects, regardless of outcome.
The Supreme Court has delivered judgment recently in the case of Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers Ltd and others [2017] UKSC 49, [2017] All ER (D) 114 (Jul), concerning the controversial question of whether those accused of sexual offences, particularly pre-charge, should be entitled to any degree of anonymity. There has been growing interest in the reporting of alleged failures on the part of police and local authorities to protect adequately vulnerable teenage girls from sexual exploitation by older men (para [1]). However, there has also been mounting concern about the reputational harm caused to those who are suspected or arrested for criminal offences (see for instance Lord Leveson, ‘Report into the culture, practices and ethics of the press’ (Vol 2); Treacy LJ and Tugendhat
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=7806223b_1)
