header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 December 2013 / Amy Fox
Issue: 7588 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Shoud I stay or should I go?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
web_fox

Amy Fox welcomes clarity on the power to stay divorce proceedings in cases involving non-contracting / third states
In 2009, four years after the judgment in Owusu v Jackson [2005] QB 801, [2005] 2 All ER (Comm) 577, HHJ Ian Karsten QC observed: “The time cannot be far off when an English judge will have to decide what the effect of Owusu is upon the power to stay divorce proceedings under the 1973 Act” (The State of International Family Law Issues: A View From London [2009] IFL 35). Four years later, the case of Mittal v Mittal [2013] EWCA Civ 1255, [2013] All ER (D) 200 (Oct) has finally forced such a decision to be made.

 

Mittal v Mittal

Mittal concerned a husband and wife, both Indian nationals, who were married in India in 2003. In 2004, their only daughter was born in India. They lived together in India until October 2006 when the husband moved to England. In February 2007, the wife and daughter joined the husband in England. They separated in September 2009.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll