header-logo header-logo

Off shore trust?

11 September 2008 / David Barry
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

When can (or will) Jersey courts enforce English orders? By David Barry

In The Imk Family Trust (Mubarak v Mubarik And Ors) Royal Court Of Jersey (deputy bailiff of Jersey, unreported, 15 August 2008) the husband and wife married in 1983. The husband and wife, as settlors, created the IMK Family Trust (the trust). The trust is a Jersey discretionary trust. The beneficiaries are the settlors, their named children and other children/issue. The trustees are third party trustees.

The trust owns shares in a Bermuda company which is the holding entity for the husband's business. The parties separated and the husband excluded the wife as a beneficiary of the trust. Mr Justice Bodey made an order requiring the husband to pay to the wife the sum of £4.875m (the ancillary relief orders).

The wife brought an application for the husband to be barred from any further participation in the English proceedings. Bodey J made an order providing if the husband wished to continue to participate he had to write a letter to the trustees stating he wished them to assist him in meeting his

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll