header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Shipping—Time charterparty—Withdrawal of vessel for non-payment of hire

Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd [2012] UKSC 17, [2012] All ER (D) 18 (May)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption SCJJ, 2 May 2012


The Supreme Court considered a clause in a charterparty containing an indemnity from the charterer in favour of the owner against all consequences or liabilities arising from the master complying with the charterer’s instructions.

Andrew Baker QC and Henry Byam-Cook (instructed by Thomas Cooper Solicitors) for the charterer. Timothy Brenton QC (instructed by Ince & Co LLP) for the owner.

In 2006, the claimant ship owner time-chartered its vessel to the defendant charterer for 36 months plus or minus 15 days at charterers’ option. The charterparty was on the Shelltime 3 Form which contained a standard form of withdrawal clause that provided that if hire was not paid when due, the owner would have the right to withdraw the vessel “without prejudice to any claim owners may otherwise have on charterers under this charter”. Clause 13 of the charterparty contained an indemnity
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll