header-logo header-logo

01 December 2011
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Shipping—Charterparty—Right to terminate charter

Parbulk II A/S v Heritage Maritime Ltd SA [2011] EWHC 2917 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 155 (Nov)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Eder J, 8 Nov 2011

There is no authority in the field of landlord and tenant to the effect that an unambiguous demand of rent operated in law as an automatic waiver of the right of forfeiture; even if there is, it is questionable whether the principle applies beyond that particular field.

David Joseph QC (instructed by Lawrence Graham) for the charterer. David Lewis (instructed by Wikborg Rein) for the owner.

The parties entered into a bareboat charterparty of the owner’s vessel from December 2007 until December 2014. From 16 April 2009, however, no hire was paid by the charterer. When the instalment that was due on 16 April 2009 was not paid, the owner sent a written notice reminding the charterer that if payment was not remedied within three banking days, that constituted an event of default under the terms of the charter which entitled the owner to terminate the charter. Effectively identical notices were sent in respect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll