header-logo header-logo

02 December 2010
Issue: 7444 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Shipping—Charterparties—BPVOY 4 form

National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia v BP Oil Supply Company [2010] EWHC 3043 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 235 (Nov)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court Field J 22, Nov 2010

On its true construction, cl 5 of the BPVOY 4 Voyage Charterparty 1st Edition—June 1998 was intended to allow for the recovery of expenses incurred to third parties, and bunkers do not come within that category of expenses.

Thomas Macey-Dare (instructed by Holman Fenwick Willan LLP) for the claimant.Henry Byam-Cook (instructed by Hill Dickinson LLP) for the defendant.

In January 2008, the claimant shipowner chartered its oil tanker to the defendant for a voyage from the Bahamas to Singapore. The charter was on the BPVOY 4 Voyage Charterparty 1st Edition (June 1998), with amendments and addenda. Loading took longer than expected due to adverse weather conditions and the vessel had to leave and reberth at one point. The claimant issued a claim for demurrage in respect of the period when the vessel was at the discharge port. Its amended demurrage invoice provided “Combine All ports: 4.5375@70,000 (Demurrage) USD 317,625.00”. That claim was paid on 9 June

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll