header-logo header-logo

04 April 2012
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Shipping

Osmium Shipping Corporation v Cargill International SA [2012] EWHC 571 (Comm), [2012] All ER (D) 196 (Mar)

Off-hire provisions of a charter did not necessarily, or indeed usually, tie in with the provisions of the charter which related to breach of obligation by one party or the other. Further, standard form charters were often used with a series of add-on special clauses which did not always fit together immaculately. Where there were one or more clauses which dealt with off-hire events, they had to be looked at together and reconciled, but where the charter provided for off-hire in some provisions and charterparty obligations and remedies for breach in others, the focus inevitably had to be on the off-hire clauses when determining whether the off-hire event had occurred.
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll