header-logo header-logo

06 May 2016
Issue: 7697 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Shipping

Shipowners’ Mutual Protection And Indemnity Association (Luxembourg) v Containerships Denizcilik Nakliyat Ve Ticaret AS [2016] EWCA Civ 386, [2016] All ER (D) 141 (Apr)

The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by charterers of a grounded vessel against a judge’s decision granting the insurers of the owner’s vessel an anti-suit injunction to restrain the continuance of proceedings brought in Turkey against the insurer of the vessel (the club) by the charterers. The court considered the juridical nature of a Turkish statute which gave a victim the right to sue a defendant’s insurer directly without first suing the insured. The judge had taken account of all the matters and had concluded that the proceedings in Turkey would be oppressive and vexatious because they would infringe the club’s contractual right, in circumstances where the club’s terms provided for London arbitration and that the club would only be liable if the owner had paid the claims against it. That was not an exercise of discretion which could be faulted.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll