header-logo header-logo

13 July 2021
Issue: 7941 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , International justice
printer mail-detail

Shell drops jurisdictional arguments

A major trial concerning liability for oil pollution in the Niger Delta is to go ahead in the High Court after Royal Dutch Shell and its Nigerian subsidiary SPDC confirmed it would not contest jurisdictional issues

The trial, Okpabi v Shell, is likely to be heard next year and to lead to the disclosure of internal Shell documents about its environmental practices in Nigeria, according to Leigh Day, the law firm representing members of the Ogale and Bille communities. The communities, comprising more than 50,000 people, allege Royal Dutch Shell and SPDC are jointly responsible for the oil pollution that has afflicted their land for decades. They are seeking clean-up and reparations for the damage.

In February, the Supreme Court held in Okpabi v Royal Dutch Shell [2021] UKSC 3 that Royal Dutch Shell was arguably liable for the pollution, which resulted from failings in SPDC’s operations, and the case could proceed in the English courts. Some remaining questions as to whether SPDC could be joined to the claims were sent to the High Court for determination. However, Shell’s confirmation that it will not contest these means the trial will go ahead, with SPDC joined.

Shell had not denied both communities were severely polluted by its oil or that no adequate clean-up had taken place. However, it had argued it could not be legally responsible for the harm and so the cases should not be heard in England.

Leigh Day partner Daniel Leader said: ‘This is a significant win for the communities.

‘After five years of legal arguments at the High Court, Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, the Communities claims can finally progress toward a trial. In the meantime, Shell’s oil contamination remains in their drinking water, land and waterways and still no clean-up has taken place.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll