header-logo header-logo

01 October 2012 / Robert Micklem
Issue: 7531 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Sharing is caring?

Parental rights should not trump children’s welfare, says Robert Micklem

This month saw the close of the government’s consultation on “Co-operative parenting following family separation”.

This sought to assess:

how the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989) could be amended to ensure courts adhere to the general principle that, on separation, it is in a child’s best interests for both parents to continue to play a role in their care and be jointly responsible for that child; and

whether the government should strengthen the court’s enforcement powers to deal with breaches of court-ordered contact arrangements.

Shared parenting

When deciding children matters, the courts already acknowledge that it is in a child’s best interest for both parents to be involved in their life. However, there is no express legislation to this effect and this has led to a social perception that the law does not fully recognise the importance both parents play in the upbringing of a child.

The government believes that enshrining the principle in law will restore public confidence in the court process and help dispel notions that the court is biased

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll